History & Comments
Back
b
Author:Mihail Turlakov
Description:
Description:
# On emergence - T&M ## [Thomas Nagel](http://www.isnature.org/Events/2009/Summer/r/Nagel1998-Rednism&AntiRednism.pdf) ## [Bob Laughlin](https://knowen.org/nodes/26512) ## Phil Anderson [More is different](https://cse-robotics.engr.tamu.edu/dshell/cs689/papers/anderson72more_is_different.pdf) - 1972 ## [Tony Leggett](https://knowen.org/nodes/26504) claiming strong emergence basically - new laws of physics!! - relative to weak emergence of Laughlin, Prigogyne, Anderson [around 0:47 min's of 1:40 podcast](https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/ideas-roadshow-podcast/id1576356614?i=1000536717034), https://ideasroadshow.com/tony-leggett/ ... therefore quantum mechanics is NOT a whole truth ## [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_F._R._Ellis](http://www.math.uct.ac.za/prof-george-ellis-0) ⏎ video 2021 [George F. R. Ellis - What Is Strong Emergence?](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wJ7id-sjiuI) [A useful result emerges: standard physics theories and the emergent theories arising out of them are all effective theories that are equally valid](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2004.13591.pdf) https://www.rd-alliance.org/system/files/documents/TheDynamicalEmergenceOfBiologyFromPhysics_0.pdf ⏎ ⏎ ## physics [Interactions - emergence versus unification?](https://knowen.org/nodes/28634) ## plus https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/theory-knowledge/202004/strong-emergence-is-valid-concept [Defining emergence in physics](https://www.nature.com/articles/npjquantmats201624) Kivelson's # Parents * Emergence and Hierarchies - T&M
Sign in to add a new comment