History & Comments
Back
Initial version
Description:Co-evolution of Science & Technology graph
# [TECH] Quantum Computing Hardware ⏎ **Quantum Computing Hardware** implements quantum bits (qubits) in physical systems — superconducting circuits, trapped ions, photons, neutral atoms — with sufficient coherence and fidelity to run quantum algorithms. ⏎ ## Overview ⏎ The leading platforms: **superconducting qubits** (IBM, Google) — fast gates, chip-based, currently 100–1000 physical qubits; **trapped ions** (IonQ, Quantinuum) — high fidelity (>99.9%), all-to-all connectivity; **neutral atoms** (QuEra) — reconfigurable arrays, 1000+ qubits demonstrated; **photonic** (Xanadu, PsiQuantum). Google's Sycamore (2019) claimed quantum supremacy for a specific sampling task. IBM's Condor (2023, 1121 qubits) and Heron processors pursue fault tolerance. Fault-tolerant quantum computing (requiring ~1M physical qubits per logical qubit for surface code) is estimated 10–20 years away. ⏎ ## Key Actors ⏎ - **Companies**: IBM (Quantum, 2016), Google Quantum AI (2012), IonQ (2015), Quantinuum (2021), QuEra (2018), Xanadu (2016), Rigetti (2013) - **Investors**: $35B+ invested in quantum computing globally (2015–2023, McKinsey) ⏎ ## Key Patents ⏎ IBM, Google, and IonQ hold the largest quantum computing patent portfolios (thousands of patents across qubit design, control electronics, error correction). ⏎ ## Economic Value ⏎ Current market: **$1.3 billion/year** (2023, IDC). McKinsey projects $170B–$450B by 2035 from pharmaceutical, chemical, financial, and logistics applications. ⏎ ## Notes ⏎ McKinsey *Quantum Technology Monitor* 2023. IDC *Quantum Computing Market Forecast* 2023. The technology is pre-commercial in most applications; economic projections are highly uncertain. ⏎ # Parents ⏎ * [SCI] BCS Superconductivity⏎
Sign in to add a new comment