Dashboard

Featured nodes

Roots

  • Public root

Templates

  • Test template
  • iCorps template
  • Guanyu's Latex template
  • Ivar's latex template
  • Family Tree template
  • Latex template
  • Router template

Trees

  • Public trees

Orphans

  • Browse orphan nodes
Related nodes

Parents1

  • Majorana Zero Modes: Braiding, Robustness & Transport

Siblings2
  • Sort by title
  • Sort by date

  • Quantum Hall Valley & Nematic Domain-Wall Transport
  • Bath-Induced Dissipative Phase Transitions
Knowenβ
  • Help
    • Welcome to Knowen!
    • Edit test node (no login required)
    • Create new test node (no login required)
  • Not logged in
    • Sign in
    • Sign up

History & Comments

Back

Initial creation

Description:Research-directions map from Google Scholar publication history
# Bath-Induced Dissipative Phase Transitions
⏎
**Anchor paper:** B. Min, K. Agarwal, D. Segal, "Role of bath-induced many-body interactions in the dissipative phases of the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model," *Phys. Rev. B* 110, 125415 (2024). [arXiv:2406.13878]
⏎
## Background
The Su-Schrieffer-Heeger (SSH) chain is a paradigmatic 1D symmetry-protected topological insulator, in the same topological-model family as the Kitaev chain that hosts Majorana zero modes. Coupling such a chain to a dissipative thermal bath is known to reshape its phase diagram, but prior treatments largely relied on weak-coupling/Markovian approximations that only renormalize single-particle (hopping) terms. Open question: how is the SSH chain's topological/trivial phase structure reorganized when system-bath coupling is treated non-perturbatively, strong enough that the bath generates genuine many-body (interaction) terms rather than just single-particle corrections?
⏎
## New results
Using a reaction-coordinate polaron transform to derive an effective Hamiltonian valid at strong coupling, the authors show local thermal baths — coupled either intracell or intercell — generate dimerized many-body fermion-fermion interactions alongside the expected hopping renormalization. Via exact diagonalization and the ensemble geometric phase, intracell coupling suppresses the topology-favoring hopping and produces interactions penalizing doubly-occupied unit cells, shrinking the topological window; intercell coupling suppresses the topology-breaking hopping while its many-body term favors the topological phase, expanding it. In both cases the bath-induced many-body interaction — not single-particle renormalization — dominates the reshaping of phase boundaries; the same mechanism extends to the related Rice-Mele model.
⏎
![Phase diagram of the dissipative SSH chain](https://arxiv.org/html/2406.13878v1/figure2.png)
*Fig. 2 — ensemble-geometric-phase phase diagrams of the dissipative SSH chain for intracell (top) vs. intercell (bottom) bath coupling, showing bath-induced many-body interactions shrinking or expanding the topological region.*
⏎
## Related work in this direction
Co-author B. Min is also a collaborator on Agarwal's Majorana-qubit robustness papers (e.g. "Dynamical approach to improving Majorana qubits and distinguishing them from trivial bound states," PRB 105, 155412, 2022). This study uses the SSH chain — a simpler cousin of the Kitaev chain — as a testbed for exactly the kind of strong-coupling, non-Markovian bath effects that matter for assessing the dissipative robustness of Majorana zero modes in wire-based qubits.
⏎
⏎
# Parents
⏎
* Majorana Zero Modes: Braiding, Robustness & Transport⏎
Sign in to add a new comment

Contact us or leave feedback

© KTree Inc. 2026  |Pricing