Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/HTML-CSS/jax.js
Now you are in the subtree of Special Topics in Many-Body Theory, Spring 2016 project. 

Holstein-Primakoff bosons

There are several useful formalisms for spin systems. We start with Holstein-Primakoff bosons, which will be useful for when we want to consider a small perturbation around an ordered state (e.g., spin-wave excitations).
S+=(2Snb)b,S=b(2Snb),Sz=Snb.
Using [b,b]=1 it is simple to check the commutation relations
[Sα,Sβ]=iϵαβγSγ.
We also need to project out all the unphysical states with nb>2S, which is consistent since the raising and lowering operators will not take one out of the physical subspace if one starts there. These are useful as a way to expand systematically around the nearly classical large-S limit.

The second formalism introduced was that of coherent states. Here the formulas are quite lengthy, and I will just refer the reader to Auerbach chapter 7. The coherent-state representation will be used to understand general spin systems (rather than just ordered states and low-energy excitations) when we set up a spin path integral in a few lectures.
The basic idea is to represent spins in a basis of states |ˆΩ that in the classical limit behave like classical vectors: the states are obtained by rotating the north pole |S,S with a rotation operator R(θ,ϕ,χ) that is a function of three Euler angles. Actually χ is essentially an arbitrary phase, which will not be important for most of what we do.

Note that both HP bosons and coherent states become much simpler in the large-S limit. You should be aware of the difference between large-S representations of SU(2), which we will study in this course, and representations of the enlarged rotation groups SU(N). Large-N is also a very useful technique but not one that we will discuss.